What is difference of your case from comment #14 and bug 932774 which are for next case? Please note that "Reply-to-Self" is feature name in Tb, and isReplyToSelf=true/false is *definition* in Tb, and it never means "You are trying to reply to mail address owned by you" or "You are trying to reply to mail address which is placed in Reply-To: header".Īs known by source code, identity selection is affected by Delivered-To: header in addition to X-Account-Key: header, and if no To: or CC:, Tb uses Delivere-To: also as "recipient list". Who has discoverd "If the From: address is an identity of mine." is you, isn't it? (i) From: To: Reply-To: => From: To: From: To: Reply-To: => From: To: From: To: Reply-To: From: To: From: To: Reply-To: From: To: X-Account-Key: is removed for ease of test and to avoid confusion)įurther, as known by source code, Tb's logic obviously skips Reply-To: header use if isReplyToSelf=true. & "the mail address is defined as identity in Tb". & "Single identity only in recipient list(all is To: case)" However, comment #14 case, and bug 932774 case which you say "same problem", are obviously for next case. > have a different agenda, in which case you need to file a separate bug > every one of my posts, including the one which started this thread. > WADA, no this has nothing to do with "Reply-to-Self" Please read carefully (In reply to Rich Pasco from comment #30) > 2613 // default behaviour for messages without Mail-Reply-To > 2599 if (type = nsIMsgCompType::ReplyToSender || type = nsIMsgCompType::Reply) I don't know about !mailReplyTo.IsEmpty() which is for Mail-Followup-To and Mail-Reply-To.īut I think that its use is not appropriate when ReplyToSender/Reply and it's better limited in "Reply to author" or "Follow up". I think "check !replyTo.IsEmpty() first(existence check of Reply-To:header), check isReplyToSelf second" is proper and simplest solution. I believe Reply-To: header must have higher priority than Reply-To-Self in Tb. ( bug 932774 is also report on From:=To: case) What s set in To: or CC: or Delivered-To:?įYI. Mail sent to and the is defined as identity of this account in Tb(if mailnews.reply_to_self_check_all_ident = false) or as identity of other account in Tb(if mailnews.reply_to_self_check_all_ident = true)? > From: Reply-to: hide To:, CC:, Delivered-To:, Sender:, etc. Where "Self" = "mail address defined as identity in Tb". Reply-To: is ignored when absolutely "Reply-to-Self", Reply-To: is ignored only when From: = To: (i.e. mail between different identities), Reply-to-Self of Tb uses Reply-To: header as expected. Try to reply at the different account's mail folder. eml file to thread pane of a mail folder of other account. (kill X-Acount-Key: based identity selection) ![]() eml file by Text Editor, remove X-Account-Key header. (B) No X-Account-Key: header, and mail is held in different accout's folder. Define the mail address as identity of other existent account. Change mail address in identity definition of the relevant account to dummy one. Keep mailnews.reply_to_self_check_all_ident = false (default=false) Symptom is "Reply-to-self feature ignores Reply-To: header", isn't it? > the Reply-to: field (containing the address of a stranger) is ignored, (snip) > It's when the From: address is one of my identities, ![]() ![]() > WADA, no the problem here is not reply-to self. (In reply to Rich Pasco from comment #22) "Setting AccountX as default account" may be needed.Īdd-on of "Correct Identity" (Read meta bug 699681 and bug 327713 comment #53, please.) In order to place mail addr of AccountX at next to current account's oneĪt From: selection list in mail composition window.ĥ. Change account number/server number of AccountX in prefs.js to account1/server1, Change mail address in identity of existent account to dummy mail address.Ĥ. Define all required mail addresses as "identity of the dummy AccountX".ģ. Create dummy POP3 account, call AccountX, with non-existent server,įor example, z.z.z, via "Manual Config" of account creation panel.Ģ. Keep mailnews.reply_to_self_check_all_ident = falseġ. To force it, followng procdure is perhaps usable.Ġ. Define all used identities at outside of actually used mail account in Tb. mailnews.reply_to_self_check_all_ident = false (default=false) If Reply-To-Self is cause, following may be a workaround. Worked correctly in webmail, reply-to was accepted thunderbird ignores it. Received: from ( )īy (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C2B1B1C009 Received: from ()īy localhost (fragaria.db. ) (amavisd-new, port 10024) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at fragaria.db. ![]() Delivered-To: from localhost (localhost )īy (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24F421C062
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |